What each one is actually asking, with examples close enough to argue about. We do not decide the answer for you.
Ancient Greece, via Plutarch
Replace the planks one at a time. When none of the original is left, is it the same ship? This is the sauce-pot problem.
Robert Nozick, 1974
A machine that gives you any experience you want, for as long as you want. None of it real. Do you plug in?
Walter Mischel, around 1970
One now, or two in fifteen minutes. The famous follow-up shrank a lot when people checked.
Güth and colleagues, 1982
They choose the split; you only accept or refuse. Refuse and you both get nothing. People refuse anyway.
Fourteenth century
Two identical bales, no reason to prefer either, and the donkey starves. The same shape as failing to pick a lunch place.
Arkes and Blumer, 1985
Money and time you cannot get back bend the next decision. Yes, sitting through the bad film.
Iyengar and Lepper, 2000
The 24-flavour table drew the crowd; the 6-flavour table made the sales. Too much choice stops the choosing.
Flood and Dresher, 1950
Both stay quiet and both do well. Selling out pays better, so both sell and both lose.
Tversky and Kahneman, 1981
"90% survive" and "10% die" are the same number. They do not get chosen the same way.
Derek Parfit, 1984
It scans you here and builds you there. Is the one who steps out you?